To start out, The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (TASM2) was no
Captain America 2. Where I had a really
hard time thinking of things I didn’t like about Captain America, TASM2 gave me
no such trouble. But that doesn’t mean
that it was terrible. I just really don’t
think anything will top Cap on my favorites list for summer 2014.
I should probably warn you that there will be spoilers
ahead. I’ll give good notice so you can
skip over them if you want to.
As the title of this post indicates, there was plenty of
corniness and cheesiness. That isn’t
necessarily a bad thing. For the most part,
it fits really well for the character.
It’s when it doesn’t have to do with Spider-Man himself that I roll my
eyes.
For example, just about everything about one of the characters
is corny. When he’s first introduced, he
has a horrible comb-over, a pocket stuffed full of pens with the possibility of
a pocket protector, and stereotypical nerd glasses. Then there’s a completely preventable
accident that gives him electric powers.
(My manager at work sometimes brings in photos of people doing stupid
stuff safety-wise. The whole scenario
surrounding the accident would fit right in with those examples.)
There were some things that were really well done with
regard to that character as well. One
thing was that eventually he figured out how to travel like electricity, which
was a really cool effect. His
progression from a nerd obsessed with Spider-Man, to a border-line Spider-man
stalker, to an insane super-villain was pretty good as well. Though I did wonder where his super-villain
outfit came from.
SPOILERS AHEAD
TASM2 was both true to and strayed away from the comic book
it comes from. The parts that strayed
were, with one exception, disappointing.
For one thing, Norman Osborn apparently dies before becoming the Green
Goblin. I say apparently because, with super-hero
comics, death is rarely permanent. But
how can Norman Osborn never become the Green Goblin? It’s not right! Another of the strays, though, was more than
welcome. It had to do with a character
that never showed up in costume until the very end of the movie: the Rhino.
In the comics he’s one of the corniest of the corny, in my opinion. He’s just a big guy in a rhinoceros suit. In the movie, the suit was almost a
mecha-like armor that actually looked pretty cool. There were also hints at another of the comic’s
cheesy villains, the Vulture—apparently for future use.
(By the way, has anyone ever wondered why there are so many animal-themed
characters associated with Spider-Man—from Spider-Man himself to the Rhino, the
Vulture, and Doctor Octopus?)
MORE SPOILERS FORTHCOMING
Anyone who is familiar with the comic book knows that Gwen
Stacy met a bad end. There were rumors
brought on by pictures of one of the outfits Emma Stone (Gwen) was wearing during
filming that she might meet that fate in this movie. I wasn’t sure if that would come to pass or
not, but it did. And it happened in a
way that was very similar to what happened in the comic. In both media, it was ambiguous as to whether
Spidey’s rescue was the cause, or if it was due to injuries caused in the event
that lead to her having to be rescued.
Even though it was a tragedy, it was one of the things that I thought
was really well done and appropriate for the story of Spider-Man.
THIS PARAGRAPH SHOULD BE SAFE
Another thing that I liked was that the cheesiness didn’t
extend to the look of the Green Goblin when he did show up. The Green Goblin of the Tobey Maguire era of
the movies was terrible due both to Willem Dafoe’s over acting and a truly
horrible design for his suit. The new
version was more menacing and much easier to take seriously.
There were a lot of things I really like about Andrew
Garfield’s portrayal of Spider-Man. For
one thing, he does Peter Parker’s awkwardness really well, both in and out of
costume. One of the things that
Spider-Man is well known for (or should be) is his corny jokes whole fighting,
and Garfield was great at them!
The special effects in the action scenes were well
done. I also enjoyed how Spidey moved,
both in travel and in combat. The
inventiveness in his use of his tools was very nice. I like that there seems to be a good amount
of effort on the part of writers and choreographers to do new and different
things with action scenes. It is
especially effective in super-hero movies in which you expect a certain amount
of gravity-defying and impossible survivability.
SORT OF SPOILER AHEAD
Another thing that I like had to do with the story, or
rather with the back story. It made this
movie a true sequel to the last one, having to do with Peter’s parents. My experience with the comics is that they
are rarely if ever mentioned. But this
is one deviation from the comics that I really like. I like that it is a factor in who Peter is as
well as shaping the world that is unfolding in the movies. I like that it’s a theme that will probably
continue to further installments.
To sum up, there were plenty of things that made me roll my
eyes and think that the film-makers could have done a better job. But there were also many things that I
thought were well done. So, even though
it wasn’t as good as Captain America 2, TASM2 will be in the plus column of
this summer’s films. If you’re looking
for a fun time at the movies, with a touch of tragedy, this one does a pretty
good job.
(As an aside, I can’t help but wonder if the director was
chosen at least in part for his name:
Marc Webb.)
Kurt and I were debating between seeing TASM2 and Captain America 2...Captain America it is :)
ReplyDelete